2
$\begingroup$

This page describes the Dobzhansky-Muller model and I can follow the illustration of the split leading to incompatible hybrids.

But at the start of the page the author states "[Dobzhansky and Muller] both realized that hybrid inviability or sterility was unlikely to arise from a single change at one locus." I don't really understand the explanation that follows i.e. what exactly is the issue with having a single change at one locus?

I wonder if someone here could explain the issue more clearly.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

If reproductive isolation was to be caused by a single mutation, then the first individual to carry this mutation would likely have a very low fitness. At the extreme, in a purely sexually reproducing species without hermaprohiditism, this individual carrying the first mutation causing reproductive isolation would have no-one to reproduce with and would have a fitness of zero.

Hence, reproductive isolation is unlikely to arise from a single mutation as these mutations are unlikely to raise into appreciable frequency. Hence, Dobzhansky and Muller (and Bateson) created this minimalist model involving only two loci with negative epistatic interactions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.