Last year appeared the new of a cancer "vaccine" (not a vaccine in the traditional sense) tested in animals for 4 types of cancer and which worked in 97% of the cases to eliminate already existent tumours.
Now appeared the new of "cancer drugs which can attack all tumours" to be fast-tracked by NHS.
Game changing cancer drugs can attack tumours
I would like to know if both procedures are based in similar ideas (meaning the second one could have a similar effectiveness to the first one) or if they are completely unrelated.