To what extent is the number of immature eggs from dissected, newly emerged individuals a reasonable approximation for maximum/potential fecundity in insects (more specifically beetles)? I know that many species must feed for the eggs to become mature and viable. However, can a comparison between species on immature eggs still be used to capture the range of maximum fecundity between species or to accurately rank species from low---high fecundity?


1 Answer 1


There are a number of things to clarify here; Fecundity is the number of offspring that is produced by an individual, and this can be separated into potential fecundity (maximum reproductive capacity) and realized fecundity (number of offspring actually produced). Realized fecundity is very similar to fertility, which is defined as the number of viable offspring that are produced.

Potential fecundity can sometimes be a good proxy for future fertility, and this is especially true for species where all eggs are present after metamorphosis of the adult insect (Awmack & Leather, 2002). However, in some species the formation of eggs is a continuous process in adult individuals, and this is relatively common in beetles. Therefore, the number of immature eggs might be a poor proxy of both potential and realized fecundity in these species (Awmack & Leather, 2002), and this is more likely in relatively long-lived species that feed extensively as adults. In beetle species that do not feed as adults (often lacking functional mouthparts), immature eggs is probably a better approximation of potential fecundity.

It should also be mentioned that the quality of host plants will often affect the maturation of eggs (Sterns & Smith, 1960; Hopkins & Ekbom, 1999), and will therefore also determine to what extent the number of immature eggs is a good indication of potential fecundity. When feeding on poor quality hosts eggs may e.g. be reabsorbed by females to use for other purposes (see references in Awmack & Leather, 2002 & Hopkins & Ekbom, 1999 for further information).

The review paper by Awmack & Leather, 2002 is very comprehensive, and contains a wealth of useful references on this topic.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .