1
$\begingroup$

An action potential can be understood in terms of voltage changes, and these are fundamentally a function of relative permeability changes, mostly for Sodium and Potassium ions. If for instance the relative permeability of a cell strongly changes in favor of Sodium, the membrane potential approaches the equilibrium potential of this ion, leading to the depolarization of the membrane.

I understand that voltage clamp methods allow us to assess these permeability changes by "clamping" the membrane potential, and equivalently keeping the driving force constant:

$I = g * (V_m - E_{eq})$

with $V_m - E_{eq}$ being the driving force.

Related to that, I have two questions:

(1) Say we are approaching the Na+ equilibrium during an action potential peak, being closer to the Na+-equilibrium means a smaller driving force, hence the ion flux is an interaction driving force x permeability. Hence why the strong emphasis on permeability if the driving force is as relevant?

(2) When we clamp the voltage, say below the Na+ equilibrium at -20mV, we will have a constant influx of Na+. While I understand that this influx consists of only few ions entering the cell, doesn't clamping over a longer period of time change the concentration because the pumps can not keep up with the constant influx of cations, adding up over time?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Relative ion permeabilities determine the equilibrium for a given configuration of ion channels. You can easily understand what is about to happen to the voltage of a cell if you know the permeabilities: if the equilibrium voltage is more positive than the present voltage, then the voltage will increase over time. The rate at which it increases depends on the membrane time constant, which depends on the capacitance of the cell (which is based mostly on membrane area, and stays relatively constant) and the resistance; the resistance is, again, based on permeability.

So permeabilities tell you A) Where you are going, and B) How fast you are going there. This is all relevant if you are living in "voltage land": you can actually ignore currents completely and just think in terms of voltage. This is the situation in 'current clamp' recording and for the most part I would say is the easier way to understand the 'big picture' for a neuron.

If, however, you want to think about currents themselves, then you typically clamp the voltage. Clamping the voltage also keeps the driving force constant (at least over the time scales on which voltage-clamp experiments make sense). In that case, you are right, you can't ignore driving force, however, in that case you are usually setting the driving force (by setting the voltage), and measuring the current. "Driving force" is then only necessary to figure out the permeability.

If you voltage clamp a cell at a depolarized potential for a long time (minutes), eventually yes the ion concentrations will change. Voltage-gated sodium channels tend to inactivate pretty quickly, so you actually won't get much sodium current when you voltage clamp at -20 mV for a long time, at least not in the soma, but you might get more current out in the distal processes that are not clamped well and other ions like calcium. Cells do not hold up well under long-term voltage clamp, however. I believe the main culprit is calcium toxicity, though it might vary by cell type and other particulars of the recording configuration. You can also kill a cell by just disrupting the membrane and making it more leaky: the concentrations change faster than the pumps can keep up with and you get excitotoxic cell death.

I usually recommend Purves' Neuroscience as a basic textbook, and the Methods in Enzymology volume on Ion Channels edited by Rudy and Iverson for patch clamp techniques and related practical wisdom.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Right, that makes sense. So when we do not clamp, driving force is relevant for explaining currents - do I understand that correctly? $\endgroup$ – Pugl Jul 29 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Pugl What do you mean by "when we do not clamp"? $\endgroup$ – Bryan Krause Jul 29 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ During the action potential, that was what the original post was referring to (I understand that driving force is constant during voltage clamp). $\endgroup$ – Pugl Jul 29 at 19:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Pugl It kind of matters what exactly you are trying to look at. If you are recording in current clamp mode with 0 current, then you are just measuring voltage. You don't have enough information because you don't know the instantaneous resistance. But if you were creating a simulation of an action potential, and you are setting the conductances, then yes you could use the driving force to calculate the current in the equation you mentioned. $\endgroup$ – Bryan Krause Jul 29 at 19:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.