Does increasing the speed of a reaction (say by introducing a catalyst) shift the equilibrium of the reaction? I assume it does not, as Gibbs free energy is not changed, but I am not sure.

  • $\begingroup$ You are right in both the conclusion and the rationale. However, you pose the question in the wrong forum. You should pose it in phyics.stackexchange.com. $\endgroup$ – Hans Sep 17 '19 at 3:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome Ben. This is a chemistry question rather than a biology (or physics) question - I've flagged it for moving to chemistry.sx. $\endgroup$ – cbeleites unhappy with SX Sep 17 '19 at 7:26
  • $\begingroup$ This is a physical-chemistry question but it is already answered in Chemistry. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Sep 18 '19 at 7:21

The equilibrium constant $K$ is the quotient of the rate constants of forward ($k_1$) and backward reactions ($k_{-1}$) (for elementary reactions).

E.g., for an equilibrium $$\ce{A + B <=> C + D}$$ we get $$\frac{[C][D]}{[A][B]} = K = \frac{k_1}{k_{-1}}$$


  • If both rate constants are affected in the same way (multiplied by the same speed-up factor) so that the quotient doesn't change, then also the equilibrium constant does not change, no shifting, no change in Gibbs free energy.
    That would be the case with your catalyst as that facilitates both forward and reverse reaction by lowering the energy of the transition state in the elementary reaction leading to just such a multiplicative increase in reaction rate - but no effect on the energy of educts or products (thus, no change in $\Delta G$).

    This has an interesting link to the impossibility of constructing a "chemical" perpetuum mobile by use of a catalyst.

  • If the rate constant of either forward or reverse reaction (or both, but not by the same factor) change, the equilibrium shifts.
    But, yes, that also means that Gibbs free energy has changed.
    Thus, there must be a change in free energy of educts and/or products as the energy of the transition state does not affect $\Delta G$, it only affects the reaction rates.
    Whether this is possible hinges on the question whether we consider it still the same reaction $\ce{A + B <=> C + D}$ or whether we say that now we have another equilibrium, say, $\ce{A' + B <=> C + D}$ or $\ce{A' + B' <=> C' + D'}$ which of course can have different equilibrium constants. An example where I think one may argue either way would be the dependency of equilibrium constants on solvent.
    (And, btw, we still cannot build a perpetuum mobile: solvation energy makes the difference)

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.