My friend keeps saying that there was a first Homo sapiens. Meaning, there was a very first human being that was ever born.

I can't really understand what she means to say from a selection/gene mutation perspective. I can't understand how there would be anything that could be considered the very first human being.

Was there ever a very first, singular human being that could be discerned as such?

  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps she is referring to mitochondrial eve or a "common-ancestor of all people alive today" which is popular with journalists, although it's thought that the human population has never had less than a few thousand common ancestors. $\endgroup$ – aliential Dec 26 '19 at 20:47
  • $\begingroup$ She means to say the quite literally "someone had to have given birth the the first human baby," just as a logical deduction. There are humans, therefore the must have been a first human baby. So, something gave birth to the very first homo sapien. $\endgroup$ – Nathaniel Dec 26 '19 at 20:51
  • $\begingroup$ perhaps ask her who made the first car? what was the first pet dog that wasn't a wolf? $\endgroup$ – aliential Dec 26 '19 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ Is there some reason you uncorrected the spelling and capitalization of Homo sapiens to "Homo Sapien"? If you insist that is correct please provide a reliable reference that supports that usage. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – tyersome Dec 26 '19 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't realize it was corrected since no one posted an edit comment. Since I have other misspellings (doing this from my phone), I assumed I had accidentally left it in the lowercase. I didn't realize that the term is lowercase $\endgroup$ – Nathaniel Dec 26 '19 at 22:14

No. It is important to distinguish "species" as a human system of classification, and "speciation" as a biological process. Except in cases like chromosomal speciation (changes in ploidy), speciation takes a long time. Probably thousands of years between some initial restriction of gene-flow, and fixation of a specific identifiable trait, present in all individuals of a species, and not present in any others. As a human system of classification, the taxonomists who define species would all understand that speciation is a process that occurs over time, although they may make some arbitrary distinction for convenience. For example, a node on a cladogram symbolizes an instantaneous process of species bifurcation, but this is understood to be an unrealistic simplification.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. While I didn't have the background, I was pretty sure that was the case. $\endgroup$ – Nathaniel Dec 26 '19 at 19:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.