2
$\begingroup$

I came across the following lines in a textbook (NCERT biology for class 11).

Systematic and monumental description of life forms, brought in, out of necessity, detailed systems of identification, nomenclature and classification. The biggest spin off of such studies was the recognition of the sharing of similarities among living organisms both horizontally and vertically

What does "both horizontally and vertically" mean?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Biology.SE! Please edit your question to include a reference for this textbook. ——— Please also take the tour and then go through the help pages starting with How to Ask questions effectively on this site and edit your question accordingly. Thanks! 😊 $\endgroup$ – tyersome Jan 9 at 18:50
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I find it unclear. Maybe "among organisms alive during the same time period ('horizontally') and between organisms and their evolutionary ancestors and descendants ('vertically')" ??? $\endgroup$ – Ben Bolker Jan 9 at 20:49
2
$\begingroup$

Ben Bolker's comment is correct; the next sentence in the passage helps to clarify (bold added):

The biggest spin off of such studies was the recognition of the sharing of similarities among living organisms both horizontally and vertically. That all present day living organisms are related to each other and also to all organisms that ever lived on this earth, was a revelation which humbled man and led to cultural movements for conservation of biodiversity.

The relationship between species in the present day are the horizontal relationships; one can define species horizontally by looking at and grouping organisms existing today (or at any other time "slice"). You can compare species horizontally by, say, looking at the skull of a human and the skull of a chimpanzee.

The relationship between species today and species that have existed in the past are the vertical relationships. For example, you could look at the skull of a modern horse and compare it to the skull of Mesohippus.

I've included a couple sources below that use this distinction, though I'm not sure where it originates.

I'd say the "horizontal" terminology comes up more frequently and may be more familiar, for example in reference to horizontal gene transfer one is talking about genetic material moving between species living at the same time. "Vertical gene transfer" can also be defined as the transmission of genetic information from parent to offspring, but more typically you would just call it inheritance.


Alvarez-Venegas, R., Sadder, M., Tikhonov, A., & Avramova, Z. (2006). Origin of the bacterial SET domain genes: vertical or horizontal?. Molecular biology and evolution, 24(2), 482-497.

Stamos, D. N. (2002). Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction. Biology and Philosophy, 17(2), 171-198.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ although in the OPs case horizontal relatedness is not being assumed to be due to horizontal gene transfer, but just due to inheriting genes from a common ancestor. $\endgroup$ – John Jan 10 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ @John Yes indeed, I'm just giving another example for where the "horizontal' term is used to refer to organisms existing at the same time. $\endgroup$ – Bryan Krause Jan 10 at 14:32
0
$\begingroup$

Horizontally refers to organisms alive at the same time, All living organisms share similar genes.

Vertically means into the past and presumably future. How both fossils and genetics show relationships between ancestors and descendants.

enter image description here

Basically the sentence is saying When you study biology and how organisms relate to one another, you see massive amounts of organized similarities in organisms both backwards through time and in extant animals inherited from common ancestors. these similarities form a predictable pattern best explained as a complex web of relatedness stretching backwards in time.

When you realize these and a lot of taxonomic terms originated from paleontology and thus ultimately geology, in which organism relationships were discussed before genetics were even discovered, it makes more sense. phylogenetic trees would have been overlaid on geologic sections. Horizontal groups were organisms in the same horizontal layer of rock thus presumably alive at the same time, vertical meant vertical depth in the rock which was of course different time periods, the deeper you go the further back in time you went. It is a poor choice of wording for a textbook, the less jargon the better, but completely normal in the scientific literature.

here is an example of one of those early combined geologic, taxonomic "trees" enter image description here

http://museum2.utep.edu/mammalogy/systematics1.htm

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.