I am searching for (and failing to find) literature about the electric charge (+/-) of viruses, specifically the Coronaviruses. I am aware that it is a complicated issue, including interaction of pH and electrostatic charges, etc. However, I note that electrostatic charge of various materials is investigated for barrier protection, suggesting that there are normal average or overall charges for viruses. Can anyone comment on this?

Especially, I want to know, at neural pH, are Coronaviruses more likely to adhere to a negatively or positively charged surface?



This is a great biological question! It asks a lot about how empirical science is done in the field of modern biology! I'm glad we encourage such questions from curious people who want to learn more.

Via: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213776/#!po=1.19048

All viruses are coated with proteins and contain genetic material which can either be DNA or RNA. Since both nucleic acids have phosphodiester bonds, the genetic material provides a partial negative charge to the virus. The viral nucleic acid genomes are wrapped in proteins that can be neutral, negative, or positive in charge. Therefore, the net charge of a virus depends upon the cumulative charges of the genetic material and the protein.

So the electric charge of a virus particle depends on the constitutive parts of the virus of interest; particularly if enveloped or non-enveloped; the outward-facing heads of the phospholipid bilayer membrane of an enveloped virus will carry a negative charge.

Two references in the above paper may help with a deeper dive into the subject:

  • Lodish H. et al. Molecular Cell Biology (ed 4.). (W. H. Freeman, New York, 2000). (Google Scholar)
  • Michen B. & Graule T. Isoelectric points of viruses B. J Applied Micb. 109, 388–397 (2010). (PubMed) (Google Scholar)

I couldn't find any papers on the electrical properties of novel coronavirus specifically. But looking into SARS-CoV may be suggestive of general properties. Its envelope proteins have a positive charge that help with targeting and infecting ACE2-expressing cells (https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2020/01/CORONAVIRUS-REPORT-1.30.2020.pdf).

  • $\begingroup$ Does it really mean that viruses are not electrically neutral (i.e., they are essentially ions) or is it mostly disbalance of charge, i.e., polarization and higher electric moments? $\endgroup$ Dec 27 '20 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ Many viruses appear to have an average isoelectric point (pI) that is below a pH of 7. This means that, at the pH of water, such viruses carry a net negative charge. Other viruses with a pI greater than 7 have a net positive charge. A pH-based separation column can be used for purification. sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/… pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18778829 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatofocusing $\endgroup$ Dec 27 '20 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ sorry, I didn't realise at first that you are talking about viruses in a solution, rather than isolated viral particles. $\endgroup$ Dec 28 '20 at 8:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.