A major difference between simple diffusion and facilitated diffusion is that facilitated diffusion has a maximum transport and velocity; the rate of diffusion is limited, whereas in simple diffusion, it isn't.
Ligand Gated channels (like any protein 'channel') transports molecules through simple diffusion, so they should not be saturable, but how does that make sense ? The channels open by the binding of a specific ligand/molecule, can't they be saturated by this ligand just like carrier proteins are saturated by the substance/molecule which will pass through ?

If they were in fact saturable, how are they considered to be part of simple diffusion?


1 Answer 1


Yes, they are saturable, because they have a finite number of 'binding sites', depending on the particular example you are looking at. Then, once they join the substrate to be transported, they need to release it at the other side of the membrane, which takes time (in very short time scales, but time nevertheless). Therefore, the saturation rate and speed of transport depends on the number of transporters on the cell's surface, the gradient differential, and the number of binding sites.

Facilitated diffusion, which needs a transporter as you point out, is a form of passive diffusion, which implies that there is no energy cost to the cell to transport the solute (as opposed to active transport). This is the key difference: energy. It does not mean that it goes as fast as osmosis or any other type of passive diffusion/transport, because, the transport that goes across the membrane (small gas molecules, and other small molecules) will clearly be faster. Also, passive diffusion does not mean that there is no upper limit to diffusion, in fact, diffusion is always limited by the concentration difference of the diffusive molecule across the membrane, no matter if this is passive or active transport.

In short, it is simple/passive diffusion because it does not need energy. Whether is saturable or not is not what matters for this classification. In fact, all diffusion has a limit.

  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I was thrown off by the figure in my physiology textbook (Guyton). here's a link to the image :imgur.com/a/TMGX9F6 Did I interpret it incorrectly ? $\endgroup$
    – Lia Ahmed
    Apr 5, 2020 at 13:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.