Many articles say that "the coronavirus" — they probably speak of the SARS-CoV-2 — can "remain alive" for so many hours on some surfaces, so many days on some other surfaces. For example, "the virus lives 5 days on glass".

I think that this is a bad choice of word. All these articles speak about the virus SARS-CoV-2 as if it were a living being. But I think it is not a living being. The virus SARS-CoV-2 does not "live" on a glass surface. It just is there.

When a virus SARS-CoV-2 is on an object, what happens to it? If it is not there anymore after 5 days, why? What does time do to a virus?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is almost a duplicate of Why does the SARS-CoV2 virus not remain infectious forever? Or does it?. Check out that question to see if the answers there answer your question $\endgroup$ – Charles E. Grant Apr 24 at 19:50
  • $\begingroup$ @Charles - This other question is interesting. But on its page there is no answer to my question. Especially, on flat glass or steel surfaces, what happens? $\endgroup$ – Nicolas Barbulesco Apr 24 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ Edit: What does time do to a virus? $\endgroup$ – Nicolas Barbulesco Apr 24 at 20:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The linked duplicate asks the same question: "All these articles speak about the virus SARS-CoV-2 as if it were a living being. But I think it is not a living being." and the answer there is "Rubber bands (for example) aren’t alive either, but there are several ways they can be destroyed, including physically pulling them apart or just by having them exposed to air enough. Viruses are the same, conceptually." If you want to ask a different question I'd strongly recommend removing the trivial bits about viruses not being "alive" that implies that this should somehow make them invulnerable. $\endgroup$ – Bryan Krause Apr 24 at 20:24

Those articles simply refer to the viability of the virus, i.e. whether it can still infect a host thereafter. (Sometimes this is referred to as "survival" of the virus.)

A unviable virion is not quite the same as it being "not there" at all, although it is so from the perspective of a host that doesn't get infected.

Those viability [in the environment] studies use a quantitative measure of how much of the virus (i.e. how many virions) are still viable after some time on some surface (or even in "the air"), e.g.

SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosols throughout the duration of our experiment (3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from 103.5 to 102.7 TCID50 per liter of air. [...]

SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces [...], although the virus titer was greatly reduced (from 103.7 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter of medium after 72 hours on plastic and from 103.7 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter after 48 hours on stainless steel).

So they are measuring the time to some [chosen] statistical threshold of viability. For reference as to their particular method:

The TCID50 (Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose) is one of the methods used when verifying viral titer.

TCID50 signifies the concentration at which 50% of the cells are infected when a test tube or well plate upon which cells have been cultured is inoculated with a diluted solution of viral fluid.

Which part of the virus machinery breaks first might depend on the environment. On copper, for example, it has been found that for "common cold" coronaviruses (e.g. HuCoV-229E):

Exposure to copper destroyed the viral genomes and irreversibly affected virus morphology, including disintegration of envelope and dispersal of surface spikes. Cu(I) and Cu(II) moieties were responsible for the inactivation, which was enhanced by reactive oxygen species generation on alloy surfaces, resulting in even faster inactivation than was seen with nonenveloped viruses on copper.


Coronavirus was exposed to metal surfaces and recovered, and the positive-stranded viral RNA genome was extracted and purified. A one-step reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative PCR (RTqPCR) was performed to detect a 139-bp region of ORF1 within nonstructural protein 4 (nsp4). Virus that had been exposed to copper and brass surfaces demonstrated reduced copy numbers of this fragment with increasing contact times. [...] . Comparison of the entire viral genome by agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed that nonspecific fragmentation occurred on copper and brass, with fragments becoming smaller with increasing contact time.

See also related q here on virus survival in small droplets, where a different inactivation mechanism is suspected.

In general, all viruses start to degrade outside their hosts at temperatures above -20C, even in the absence of some more specific environmental stressors (like unfavorable humidity, reactive surfaces like Cu, etc.) In suitable hosts, this temperature-based degradation is more than offset by the virus' multiplication.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I have added to my question: What does time do to a virus? $\endgroup$ – Nicolas Barbulesco Apr 24 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ @NicolasBarbulesco: Time does nothing unless the temperature is high enough or there are some other "nasty" environmental factors. Influenza viruses have been preserved for over 50 years in cryogenic conditions (once unfrozen they are viable), some viable viruses have been recovered from 30,000 years-old permafrost;.see end of my answer and the med SE q linked from there for details. Are you asking for details about temperature-related degradation (as it's the most general mechanism)? $\endgroup$ – SX welcomes ageist gossip Apr 24 at 20:36

From What happens to viruses that causes them to die?:

TL;DR: Factors such as UV light and heat causes the mix of RNA, fatty membrane, and protein making up the viruses to steadily break down.

More details:


Strictly speaking, viruses can’t die, for the simple reason that they aren’t alive in the first place. Although they contain genetic instructions in the form of DNA (or the related molecule, RNA), viruses can’t thrive independently. Instead, they must invade a host organism and hijack its genetic instructions.


Just hanging about in the atmosphere, the effect of factors such as UV light and heat causes the mix of RNA, fatty membrane, and protein making up the [viruses] to steadily break down in a few hours [or less/more].

https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/19/coronavirus-survives-on-surfaces-how-to-protect-yourself/ (mirror):

Viruses covered in “envelopes” have the most trouble surviving outside a living cell. On surfaces, the surrounding light, heat, and dryness break down the envelope, killing the virus. (Porous surfaces pull moisture away from viruses that land on them, accelerating the destruction of the envelope.) Most rhinoviruses have such envelopes; so do some influenza viruses. Norovirus doesn’t, enabling it to last longer in the environment.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.