I am not a biologist. But googling "epigenetics lamarck", I find many different opinions:

This is highly confusing to laypersons such as myself and I'm hoping an expert here can explain to me why there seem to be such vehement disagreements on this matter.

Here's my simplistic layperson understanding of the matter:

  • Lamarck: Variations transmitted from parent to child can be influenced by the experiences of the parent.
  • Darwin: Lamarck is wrong, variations transmitted from parent to child are purely random and cannot be influenced by the experiences of the parent.

Based on my above simplistic understanding (correct me if I've made any errors), it seems to me that epigenetics suggests that there is at least some element of truth to Lamarckism. Am I mistaken?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This post is similar to [biology.stackexchange.com/questions/3789/…. $\endgroup$ – MikeyC Jun 15 '20 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Biology.SE! Please take the tour and then go through the help pages starting with How to Ask questions effectively on this site. In particular note that questions likely to generate opinions rather than facts are against site guidelines — please edit your question accordingly. Please also take the time to search for "Lamark" and "epigenetics" on this site as similar questions have come up before. — Thanks! 😊 $\endgroup$ – tyersome Jun 16 '20 at 0:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.