1
$\begingroup$

I want to understand the environmental impact of oak trees due to absorption carbon dioxide. So my question is, what is the mass of carbon dioxide absorbed by an oak tree in one year?

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ What's the difference between '$CO2$' and '$\ce{CO2}$' ? I'm new to SE. $\endgroup$ Jul 16 '20 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ Oh ok, thank you. I have now proposed an edit using that format. Will that be for an equilibrium reaction with k1 and K2 as forward and backward rate constants? $\endgroup$ Jul 16 '20 at 19:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Sometimes, the simple solutions work well: CO<sub>2</sub>. $\endgroup$ Jul 16 '20 at 19:55
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It's uncommon (and probably not that useful) to consider this sort of question from a "per tree" perspective. "Per tree" depends greatly on the surrounding environment. Instead, people typically approach carbon fixation from a "per area" perspective. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Jul 16 '20 at 20:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I upvoted @RodrigodeAzevedo comment, but neither work in titles on the phone and the Math thingy is unreadable. In any case one has always to ask oneself why not just writing carbon dioxide? It’s not as if there’s any equation involved. So it’s not justified. So I’ll edit it. $\endgroup$
    – David
    Jul 16 '20 at 22:11
1
$\begingroup$

Re: Bryan Krause's comment, measurements per hectare are common. However, if you can just estimate average trees per hectare, then it works out. But it still likely depends on the local climate, ecology etc. It also varies across the life term of the tree.

Some estimates have been made, such as in this paper (see Table 4), for Quercus rubra and 2 other hardwood species. They estimate that for the most mature trees, Q. rubra stores ~20 Mg/hectare total biomass, of which approximately half is carbon.

This is a little more than twice the biomass of the 8-year-old tree, so if we just linearly interpolate we could say that a hectare of oak stores ~1 Mg C per year. There are some problems with this- for example, older trees are likely to store much more than that, but it is not clear exactly how much variation there is over the course of an oak's life, and also there is likely variation between the sites in the study.

It is also clear that the other species measured, e.g. American chestnut, are more effective carbon sinks than oaks as young trees.

See the paper or this pop science article on the subject for more information. THere are also a number of papers citing that paper that may be interesting, such as this, this, and this.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.