What is known about the genes responsible for inherited facial features — the family resemblances that are so recognizable? Take for example a particular shape of nose: which gene or genes make it snub or Roman?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you read the tour you will see that this is a site for "biology researchers, academics, and students". Now I am afraid that although it is sometimes possible to answer questions from laymen in common language, this is not the case here. First, the answer is complex because many genes come into play, second if you don't study biology you will not be familiar with the molecular genetic language and concepts. When you can say that you have been reading some elementary genetics, you may be able to frame a suitable question (however old you are). (But please run a spelling check next time.) $\endgroup$
    – David
    Aug 13, 2020 at 11:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Andrew several studies (see my answer) suggest the the heritability of facial morphology is between ~60-90%, so it's inaccurate to say the environment is 'large responsible' $\endgroup$
    – user438383
    Aug 13, 2020 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ As there is one good answer to your question, I have edited it to a form that I think acceptable (if still a bit broad and showing no research). You may or may not be able to understand the answer, but it is appropriate to this site. $\endgroup$
    – David
    Aug 13, 2020 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ So some genes from diffrent peoples just decode for slightly diffrent protein? $\endgroup$
    – user60511
    Aug 14, 2020 at 16:03

1 Answer 1


First, it's been estimated that the narrow-sense heritability of facial morphology is about ~60-90% (Martinez-Abadias et al 2009, Weinberg et al 2013, Liu et al 2012), so genetics is likely to be a greater influence than environment. But actually, the molecular genetic understanding of cranio-facial morphology is quite poor relative to other quantitative traits.

There's a list of genes from Wu et al (2019) which have been implicated and replicated across studies, but it's likely that there is a substantial amount of population specific differences in the effect size of different genes. The most replicable gene is PAX3 (which encodes a transcription factor).

As for the actual molecular genetics, it's complicated. Here are some quotes from a review (Weinberg et al 2018):

As with most common traits [61], the implicated variants from the above facial GWAS tend to reside in noncoding (regulatory) regions of the genome. Many variants at the 15 aforementioned facial loci were in or near enhancers known to play a role in human craniofacial development.

An important finding from this study was that the effects of genetic variants on facial morphology tend to be highly specific, even within a single structural component like the nose. Another important finding was that variants at these 15 loci tended to show preferential activity in human cranial neural crest cells—a critical cell population for building the face.

As for a more specific example, Adhikari et al (2016) peformed a GWAS on admixed Latin Americans and identified a significant association in the EDAR gene (well studied and known for being at high frequency in East Asian populations and influencing ear wax type, follicle/gland type and teeth formation). EDAR has a general role in the development of ectodermal tissues (such as the skin).

They found that the variant in EDAR was associated with reduced chin protrusion. Other studies have also shown that EDAR variants influence the cranial morphology in mice (using knockout studies). Functionally, they propose that:

The impact of the Eda pathway on mandibular morphology has been interpreted as resulting from epithelial–mesenchymal interactions during mouse craniofacial developme


Martinez-Abadias, N. et al. Heritability of human cranial dimensions: comparing the evolvability of different cranial regions. J. Anat. 214, 19–35 (2009).

Weinberg, S. M., Parsons, T. E., Marazita, M. L. & Maher, B. S. Heritability of face shape in twins: a preliminary study using 3D stereophotogrammetry and geometric morphometrics. Dent. 3000, 1 (2013).

Liu, F. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002932 (2012).

Wu, W., Zhai, G., Xu, Z. et al. Whole-exome sequencing identified four loci influencing craniofacial morphology in northern Han Chinese. Hum Genet 138, 601–611 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-019-02008-6

Weinberg, Seth M., Robert Cornell, and Elizabeth J. Leslie. "Craniofacial genetics: Where have we been and where are we going?." (2018): e1007438.

Adhikari, Kaustubh, et al. "A genome-wide association scan implicates DCHS2, RUNX2, GLI3, PAX1 and EDAR in human facial variation." Nature communications 7.1 (2016): 1-11.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It would be nice if you could actually link to the articles. It’s a pain to have to search for the paper — even more so on a phone. $\endgroup$
    – David
    Aug 13, 2020 at 16:08

You must log in to answer this question.