0
$\begingroup$

I've been reading a lot about Hi-C lately, and this has been bothering me. So far as I can tell from reading around, the topology is related to the conformation of the linear chromosome. This seems like a fairly pointless description however, as they should all have the same topology. A "conformation", in my understanding, is the chromosome being folded into a particular geometry.

On the other hand though, I guess if two genes were brought together to form a loop, they would also form a "hole" (the gap in the loop). But this seems like a weak connection to make, just because two chromosome regions are paired doesn't necessarily mean they were bound and formed a loop. It seems the "topology" would "best" be seen after a 3D reconstruction from the pairs data, showing the predicted geometry, and from there you could see how many putative loops and such there are, and thus start to determine the topological properties.

The last possibility I was thinking was that this is in reference to network topology implied by a contact matrix. This seems the most likely to me, but also the least implied (to me, at least) in the literature I've ever read.

All of this has me wondering if I've missed something about the meaning of "topology" here, as opposed to just "conformation". I'm wondering if there is a consensus on the precise meaning of topology in the genomics/Hi-C context.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 'topology' can just mean 'shape' . "the way in which constituent parts are interrelated or arranged." whether it is point-set topology, algebraic topology, network topology, chromosome topology. It is the study of the shape of something. $\endgroup$ – JimN Sep 9 at 7:05
  • $\begingroup$ Conformation (chromosome) refers to the spatial organization of chromatin in a cell. A wide range of eukaryotic organisms fold into higher-order chromatin domains. These are affected by TADs (topologically associated domains), LADs (lamina-associated domains), NADs (nucleolus associated domains), constitutive and dynamic. $\endgroup$ – m4rio Sep 9 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ Topology isn't just about shape though, but about the properties of a shape that are conserved under continuous deformation, ie folding, which all chromosomes would share (w some special case exceptions). As wiki states: 'The motivating insight behind topology is that some geometric problems depend not on the exact shape of the objects involved, but rather on the way they are put together.' Linearly, all chromosome (of same type) are put together the same way. I can see how perhaps there is a network topology interpretation of Hi-C data, but it doesn't seem like the implied interpretation $\endgroup$ – user8243 Sep 9 at 13:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user8243 You are hung up on a mathematical terminology. Your quote about continuous transformation refers to the mathematical term for topology, then the disambiguation goes on to mention discrete , network, electronic layout and geospatial topologies. It's not a word that came from math. Math uses that word because it means "shape" and no one says "shape theory". I am not sure why mathematicians feel like they own the word... they don't use this with english words 'category', 'field' or 'group' probably because those are far more used in english language than "topology". $\endgroup$ – JimN Sep 16 at 3:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ no one asks about the genus of a chromosome topology just like no one asks about the order of a finite football field. Just about any chromosome topology reference that uses the word 'genus' is referring to the taxonomic level between 'family' and 'species'. $\endgroup$ – JimN Sep 16 at 3:39
2
$\begingroup$

I think that there are a few things going on in this question, I'm going to try to answer the ones that I think are most pertinent:

  1. We should not expect "topology" as used in the Hi-C field to have a rigorous mathematical interpretation. Most of the people thinking about it are ultimately biologists who are interested in biological problems. As suggested in the comments, they are basically interested in the shape of DNA in the cell; e.g. which pieces of DNA are close together and which are far away. You can use this information for a lot of different purposes of course, but most people using the technique are satisfied with viewing topology as "the set of pairwise distances between all DNA chunks" (and whatever things you can infer from that set).

  2. Your sense (from the comment) that the linear chromosome ordering is the main interesting feature of topology is (IMO) absolutely correct. However, it is not a given that every chromosome is put together the same way. This is related to the most useful application of Hi-C data that I know of, which is to either (A) scaffold genomes (put discontinuous sequences into the right order) or (B) deconvolute mixed populations of genomes into groups of sequences that belong to the same cell. The linear order of DNA is by at least an order of magnitude the dominant signal in the data, and is therefore the most trustworthy thing in there.

  3. Network topology is sometimes implicit but generally central as a feature of algorithms using Hi-C data. I don't know that we can say that all workers in the field are thinking of this when they talk about topology, but I certainly am. Some random papers that make it fairly obvious: here, here, here.

(Full disclosure: I work for a company that sells Hi-C kits and services.)

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your reply. My question is in part critical of (what I believe is) an unecessary and ambiguous use of the word. Technically, "geometry" seems to be a better word, but was more frustrating was that "conformation" often seemed not only appropriate as well, but redundantly used alongside "topology". I'm critical of this though not out of a sense of "elitism", but because it is genuinely confusing. Anyone trying to understand the "topology" part here will be seriously confused if they end up reading about actual topology. Your answer is helpful in clarifying its use here $\endgroup$ – user8243 Sep 15 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ This ambiguity is compounded when its use varies, from a "network" sense to a "shape" sense, that the sense of its use is rarely explicated clearly, and that the term is used so promiscuously. HOWEVER, this is not to say that using the word "topology" is monopolized by mathematics - I do recognize when a field uses a shared term, it is possible it has different connotations (the point of this question, and you gave a good answer I think). $\endgroup$ – user8243 Sep 15 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ Still, all of these considerations together mean that the use of "topology" here is very vague and almost inexplicable in its general definition, having very idiosyncratic use going from paper-to-paper, or even year-to-year. Not even in terms of linguistic use, but even just in terms of scientific clarity, this seems like an unfortunate flaw. $\endgroup$ – user8243 Sep 15 at 20:41
  • $\begingroup$ Also, I appreciate those paper links. I see what you're saying about the uses there $\endgroup$ – user8243 Sep 15 at 20:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ accept the fact that the english word "topology" means anything referring to shape. Another dictionary definition: "1: topographic study of a particular place specifically : the history of a region as indicated by its topography". Another dictionary: "the way the parts of something are organized or connected:" Every field of study is entitled to use an english word as it suits their needs $\endgroup$ – JimN Sep 16 at 3:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.