I am looking for a term that describes DNA regions that overlap genes, i.e., non-intergenic DNA regions.
For example, say I am writing a paper about DNA-binding sites (i.e., DNA sequences that proteins bind to), but my paper focuses exclusively on DNA-binding sites that happen to overlap genes. What would my title be? "Non-intergenic DNA-binding sites are [...]" is one option, but I wonder whether a more appropriate term exists.

If I understand correctly, "Gene-overlapping" seems to be used for referring to genes that overlap other genes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlapping_gene).
Also, Google says that "genic" means "relating to genes".

Is any of my ideas appropriate? Or maybe another term?

To clarify what I mean by intergenic and non-intergenic, here is the figure from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergenic_region. I added an example for a non-intergenic DNA region.
enter image description here
Explicitly, an intergenic DNA region is a DNA region that doesn't share any base with any gene. A non-intergenic DNA region is a DNA region that shares at least one base with a gene.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "regions that overlap genes" and how is that different from genes themselves? $\endgroup$ – BagiM Jan 2 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ inter means between, intra means within, think inter-state highway. $\endgroup$ – John Jan 2 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ @BagiM and John, I tried to clarify. Please point out if it still isn't clear. $\endgroup$ – Oren Milman Jan 2 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ Your "non-intergenic DNA region" overlaps the purple gene and possibly some of the red, too, so I don't understand what's non-intergenic about it. $\endgroup$ – MattDMo Jan 2 at 20:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I wouldn't use non-intergenic to refer to sequences that contain at least one base of a gene, because, at least according to your graphic, a large portion of it still could be intergenic material. Maybe just call them gene-overlapping regions? I'm really not sure. $\endgroup$ – MattDMo Jan 2 at 20:46

It seems to me that "genic" is a perfectly good word.

This paper uses "genic" directly as a contrast to "intergenic", so that seems like a reasonable precedent:

‘Noncoding DNA’ can be found both surrounding genes, and within genes (see schematic Figure 1). We will call the first type ‘intergenic’, and the second type ‘genic’, a ‘gene’ referring here to a transcribed DNA sequence.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.