2
$\begingroup$

I was trying to find out more about gustation and the transduction of sourness when I came across the supposed inward-rectifying potassium channel $\ce{K+_{ir} 2.1}$. Here's the thing, despite being inward rectifying, all the articles I read about it involves it sending potassium ions out of the cell. I thought that maybe there is a special mechanism that makes it outward-rectifying, or just switches off its mechanism for inward rectification but to no avail.

So here's the context: On taste buds that detect $\ce{H+}$ ions, when intracellular pH rises due to intake of protons, potassium channels will be closed which causes accumulation of $\ce{K+}$ and thus depolarisation. The article pinpoints $\ce{K+_{ir} 2.1}$ as one of the potassium channels involved, saying that its inhibition will allow for depolarisation. This doesn't make sense to me, if this channel is supposed to prefer intake of potassium ions and almost entirely prohibit outward flow. If we want to accumulate potassium in the cell, shouldn't this channel be left open?

The only thing I can think of is that this channel remains open at membrane potentials near that of resting potential. So maybe then there is no selectivity over which direction the ions travel, so there is a net outward flow?

I'll link some of the articles I mentioned below:

The K+ channel KIR2.1 functions in tandem with proton influx to mediate sour taste transduction

Inhibition of Kir2.1 channel-induced depolarization promotes cell biological activity and differentiation by modulating autophagy in late endothelial progenitor cells.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Short answer

"Inward rectifying" doesn't mean "only allows inward current". Current through inward-rectifying channels can be (and often is) entirely outward in physiological settings.

Explanation

For a non-rectifying channel, there is a linear current-voltage relationship. If you plot current through the channel at various holding voltages, you get a straight line.

For inward-rectifying potassium channels, you get less current as you depolarize, like this:

enter image description here (from Wikipedia)

At negative voltages, the channel is pretty linear and strongly inward (negative). However, at more positive voltages, the linear trend is attenuated.

However, this relationship does not upset the equilibrium potential for a given ion. For a potassium channel, if you have a cell with a potassium reversal potential that is more negative than the membrane potential, you'll still get an outward flow of potassium ions (in the figure, note all the lines above 0, representing voltages more positive than the potassium reversal potential; they're positive/outward even if they're small). What is different for the inward-rectifying channel is that as you depolarize the cell, the current does not increase the way you would expect it to increase for a non-rectifying channel.

For example, for a non-rectifying channel, you'd expect with a potassium reversal of -90mV, the current would be the same magnitude but opposite sign at -120 mV and -60 mV (30 mV above and below reversal). For a inward rectifying channel, you will still have the same change in sign, but the magnitude will be less at -60 mV than at -120 mV.

its inhibition will allow for depolarisation

Any channel permeable to some ion (or combination of ions) will tend to move the voltage towards the reversal potential for that ion/ions. So, as long as potassium reversal is more negative than threshold, all potassium-only conductances are inhibitory, whether they rectify or not.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.