If all of the characteristics of life are required for something to be defined as living, how can we account people or other life that can not reproduce?
closed as unclear what you're asking by James, rg255, kmm, AliceD♦, fileunderwater Jun 9 '16 at 9:38
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Every species has the ability to reproduce. Of course, individuals within a species can be born with a mutation that keeps them from reproducing, or lose the ability to reproduce at some point in life. However, to say that once these individuals fail to meet that criteria they are no longer forms of life would be a fairly absurd semantics argument. It might be useful to note in an evolutionary sense that those individuals can no longer pass on their genes, which is could select against whatever it was the resulted in that individual being sterile.
You could probably reword the characteristics of life to stress species instead of individuals, but then theres a problem with microbes which have very poorly, or non-existent species. But in general, this is not something a biologist is going to lose sleep over.