Skip to main content
6 of 6
deleted 1 character in body
AliceD
  • 52.6k
  • 19
  • 176
  • 241

Why can't we see in low light if staring long enough?

For me it seems reasonable that if I kept my gaze on a fixed point in a room with low light, a progressively brighter and better picture would appear before my eyes, just like a camera can see in the dark if the shutter speed is really slow, e.g. 4 seconds exposure. Why can't our brain do this trick as well (accumulate visual information over time)? Or is it a limitation of the eyes?

edit:

To further clarify what I'm after; I will show a concrete example from the world of photography (images taken from this website).

Here is an example where we have a series of underexposed images - this would be what the brain receives: Series of under exposed images

Now, combining all of them with a simple add-operation reveals one image that has normal exposure. Sum of all images equals one normal exposed image

This seems like a simple trick for our powerful brain - surely it can add incoming signals?

filip
  • 369
  • 3
  • 7