Timeline for How can I label cryotubes in a way that eliminates the problem of legible hand-writing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 7, 2020 at 23:21 | answer | added | Victor | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 5:39 | comment | added | March Ho | Barcodes would not be a good solution due to the ice crystal formation when the tubes are removed from storage preventing scanners from working. | |
Oct 23, 2015 at 4:17 | comment | added | MaxW | It doesn't seem that "legible hand-writing" would be a problem. Rather the problem is illegible handwriting. Could you have some technician with legible hand-writing just prenumber the tubes? | |
Oct 27, 2014 at 9:04 | comment | added | WYSIWYG | One way to get around this problem is to keep similar samples in the same box; for e.g One box per cell type and label the box nicely [easier to write legibly on a big box]. Keep the marking requirements minimal on the tube (for e.g. just dates) | |
Oct 12, 2014 at 2:33 | answer | added | rhill45 | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 11, 2014 at 8:37 | answer | added | Chris♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 10, 2014 at 20:59 | answer | added | user137 | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 10, 2014 at 19:25 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBiology/status/520656387542892544 | ||
Oct 10, 2014 at 18:31 | history | asked | Slavatron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |