Skip to main content

I am reading a GWAS paper that found a SNP associated to predisposition to colon cancer and was assessed for gene expression of the nearby gene. They found that the genotype accounted for 55% of the variation in the nearby gene expression. 55% sounds like a lot to me, what is the usual percent accounted for a significant SNP in a study like this?

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v44/n7/full/ng.2293.html

I am reading a GWAS paper that found a SNP associated to predisposition to colon cancer and was assessed for gene expression of the nearby gene. They found that the genotype accounted for 55% of the variation in the nearby gene expression. 55% sounds like a lot to me, what is the usual percent accounted for a significant SNP in a study like this?

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v44/n7/full/ng.2293.html

I am reading a GWAS paper that found a SNP associated to predisposition to colon cancer and was assessed for gene expression of the nearby gene. They found that the genotype accounted for 55% of the variation in the nearby gene expression. 55% sounds like a lot to me, what is the usual percent accounted for a significant SNP in a study like this?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackBiology/status/217974742194470913
Source Link
719016
  • 1.8k
  • 13
  • 25

variation in expression accounted for a SNP -- what's a usual percent?

I am reading a GWAS paper that found a SNP associated to predisposition to colon cancer and was assessed for gene expression of the nearby gene. They found that the genotype accounted for 55% of the variation in the nearby gene expression. 55% sounds like a lot to me, what is the usual percent accounted for a significant SNP in a study like this?

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v44/n7/full/ng.2293.html