Skip to main content

Timeline for Why do adult insects have 6 legs?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 14, 2017 at 16:44 comment added user151841 @bshane I disagree that this pre-supposes perfect adaptation. Rather I think we should focus on highly-preservedness. Very few members of Insecta have lost a set of legs. Why would such a body plan be highly preserved, when it has such obvious costs? It must offer broad-ranging adaptiveness. What would that be, exactly?
Aug 24, 2017 at 5:57 comment added Remi.b The question is actually very related to Why don't mammals have more than 4 limbs?
Nov 5, 2015 at 7:20 vote accept DrZ214
Nov 5, 2015 at 7:20
Oct 29, 2015 at 6:56 history edited WYSIWYG CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 88 characters in body
Oct 28, 2015 at 17:36 history tweeted twitter.com/StackBiology/status/659423577658236929
Oct 28, 2015 at 5:13 history reopened AliceD
WYSIWYG
Oct 26, 2015 at 22:37 review Reopen votes
Oct 27, 2015 at 5:23
Oct 26, 2015 at 13:13 history edited fileunderwater CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected title
Oct 5, 2015 at 5:07 history closed fileunderwater
Luke
WYSIWYG
Duplicate of Why do some bad traits evolve, and good ones don't?
Oct 2, 2015 at 15:28 answer added bshane timeline score: 7
Oct 2, 2015 at 13:52 history edited AliceD CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body; edited tags
Oct 2, 2015 at 13:42 history edited AliceD CC BY-SA 3.0
added 23 characters in body
Oct 2, 2015 at 13:31 answer added AliceD timeline score: 18
Oct 2, 2015 at 10:59 comment added Luke As it stands I agree with @fileunderwater -- this is a question about evolutionary advantages. However, if you were to make this question about the various functions that insects put their "legs" to then it is no longer a "duplicate" of that question. Even if this question is closed as a duplicate, you can edit it and it can be reopened :)
Oct 2, 2015 at 8:08 review Close votes
Oct 5, 2015 at 5:07
Oct 2, 2015 at 7:04 comment added bshane This is a little semantically tricky, because not all insects use all of their 'legs' as 'legs', in the sense of 'a thing to walk with'. Consider the raptorial forelegs of mantises - the animal uses them to catch prey, not to walk. They are called 'legs' because of homology, not function. So if your question is 'why do insects have six things that they walk on?' then the answer is that often, they don't. In that case, there is no apparent advantage to explain. If your question is 'why six "legs"?', then the answer is 'by definition, from common descent'.
Oct 2, 2015 at 6:28 comment added DrZ214 @bshane No I'm not satisfied with that answer, but I edited the 1st paragraph to make it clear there is an apparent advantage. At the very least, I want to know what the middle legs of insects do...and if it's something that 4-legged critters cannot.
Oct 2, 2015 at 6:28 history edited DrZ214 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 51 characters in body
Oct 2, 2015 at 6:26 comment added DrZ214 @WYSIWYG hmm great point. Nevertheless, there is an apparent advantage to having 6 legs as an insect that does not seem to exist for us larger land creatures. I want to know what that is. What are those middle legs used for?
Oct 2, 2015 at 6:21 comment added WYSIWYG Insects are not the ancestors of higher organisms. And BTW octopus is one organism which will be a counter-example.
Oct 2, 2015 at 5:41 comment added bshane It seems like this question presupposes perfect adaptation. Many features of modern life-forms aren't necessarily 'better' than other possible features, but are the way they are as a result of historical chance and the constraints imposed by development. Would you be satisfied with the answer "the last common ancestor of all insects had six legs, and that worked well enough that it has been kept by most of its descendant lineages"?
Oct 2, 2015 at 5:21 review First posts
Oct 2, 2015 at 6:01
Oct 2, 2015 at 5:18 history asked DrZ214 CC BY-SA 3.0