Skip to main content
replaced http://biology.stackexchange.com/ with https://biology.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Examples when intuition don't match the above picture

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this postthis post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

Population culture vs science literature

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept is also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Examples when intuition don't match the above picture

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

Population culture vs science literature

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept is also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Examples when intuition don't match the above picture

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

Population culture vs science literature

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept is also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

added 109 characters in body
Source Link
Remi.b
  • 68.3k
  • 11
  • 144
  • 235

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Examples when intuition don't match the above picture

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

Population culture vs science literature

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept osis also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept os also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Examples when intuition don't match the above picture

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

Population culture vs science literature

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept is also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

added 116 characters in body
Source Link
Remi.b
  • 68.3k
  • 11
  • 144
  • 235

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (Thankssee this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for its commentthe comments)

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept os also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (Thanks @WYSIWYG for its comment)

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept os also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

Good question.

There is no fundamental difference between parasites and predators.

Ecological Interaction

In terms of ecological interaction, they are both defined as an interaction where one species benefits and the other suffers from the interaction.

Intuition parasite vs predator

enter image description here

In general predation is viewed as a big individual eating a smaller one while parasitism is when a small individual eats a bigger one. These general intuition however fails to consider a number of cases. Here some cases I can think of

Generally considered as predation but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • social animals attacking in groups preys that are much larger than themselves - non-social animal attacking prey larger than themselves
  • herbivores browsing on large trees

Generally considered as parasitism but does not fit the above picture-based definition:

  • indirect effect of habitat modification that would rather be considered as parasitism.
  • Species that take advantage of parental care of another species by mimicking babies (but being larger)
  • Individuals of large species stealing the habitat built by a smaller species
  • Batesian mimicry (see this post; Thank you @WYSIWYG and @NL_Derek for the comments)

In the popular culture, some people call parasites only endoparasites. This concept os also misleading and not so much in accordance with the general literature in biology.

added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Remi.b
  • 68.3k
  • 11
  • 144
  • 235
Loading
Source Link
Remi.b
  • 68.3k
  • 11
  • 144
  • 235
Loading