Timeline for Evolutionary Midways
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://biology.stackexchange.com/ with https://biology.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Oct 29, 2016 at 5:10 | comment | added | Liu Tianyi | Yes you weren't writing about it but I was asking about it. I had thought that complex systems are irreducible, therefore midways are impossible. But I was wrong. | |
Oct 28, 2016 at 22:05 | history | edited | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2016 at 21:58 | history | edited | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:56 | history | edited | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 137 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:52 | comment | added | Remi.b |
No, I am not at all writing about Irreducible Complexity. Irreducible Complexity has nothing to do with science. It is a fallacy (or set of fallacies) build by creationists. As the wikipedia article you link says: Irreducible complexity [..] is rejected by the scientific community, which regards intelligent design as pseudoscience . If your aim is to learn about evolution, I would recommend reading from the popular science literature (and not pseudo-science and other sources of unjustified arguments). There are many good sources of knowledge, one of them being linked in the post.
|
|
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:44 | vote | accept | Liu Tianyi | ||
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:44 | comment | added | Liu Tianyi | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity Seems to be what I was writing about. (Just found this out). Thanks for your answer too. | |
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:36 | history | edited | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 257 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:27 | history | edited | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2016 at 16:20 | history | answered | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |