Timeline for Is most of the human genome functionless “junk DNA”?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2019 at 16:01 | history | edited | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2018 at 18:47 | comment | added | user38945 | Remi.b’s last paragraph is neither an ad hominem towards Icke nor should be deleted. Icke’s scientific illiteracy is relevant to conclude that he’s in no position to criticize scientific consensus (but in this case, the consensus of "junk DNA" has been invented). Many of his claims are extraordinary and the evidence provided leaves much to be desired, so what he says has to be taken with a grain of salt. For example, he believes in “monoatomic gold”, a very problematic concept on its own (rationalwiki.org/wiki/ORMUS). | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 16:23 | comment | added | JCThomas | You say it's 5-10% that's regulatory in the other answer, which I think is more accurate | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 15:11 | comment | added | Charlie | I know a lot about Icke's material. Some is spot on and some is sketchy, but I don't think ad hominem ever discredits an argument so it's probably best to removed the last paragraph. | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 15:08 | history | answered | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |