Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 16, 2013 at 3:00 review Community Evaluations
Jul 24, 2013 at 3:00
May 30, 2013 at 13:58 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackBiology/status/340104898131656705
May 30, 2013 at 11:32 comment added Chinmay Kanchi @ftt Nope. That's why it was a comment and not an answer ;)
May 30, 2013 at 10:51 answer added AndroidPenguin timeline score: 2
May 30, 2013 at 7:28 comment added rg255 What @ChinmayKanchi says makes sense, an allergic reaction is a response to unknown antigens, those antigens in meat are more likely to be our own - being allergic to these antigens would be like walking around with a giant self-destruct button on your forehead and hoping someone doesn't push it...
May 29, 2013 at 15:57 comment added ftt Chinmay Kanchi, yes, that's plausible to me. But do you know anything to support this hypothesis?
May 29, 2013 at 6:51 comment added Chinmay Kanchi I suspect that the reason mammalian meat allergies are so rare is that they cause extreme morbidity or mortality in kids. Essentially, most components of mammalian meat are going to be very similar or identical to self-antigens and therefore, your immune system will destroy your own body from the inside out.
May 28, 2013 at 20:24 history edited ftt CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified that I'm not interested in seafood, only mammalian meat and poultry
May 28, 2013 at 20:22 comment added ftt Yes, excluding seafood. I'll fix the wording.
May 28, 2013 at 19:59 review First posts
May 28, 2013 at 21:32
May 28, 2013 at 19:52 comment added kmm Do you mean few mammal meat allergies? There are many fish and invertebrate (e.g., shellfish) allergies.
May 28, 2013 at 19:40 history asked ftt CC BY-SA 3.0