Timeline for Is it the case that all changes in phenotype during life are not inheritable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 at 7:26 | history | edited | Gianpaolo R | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed not-necessary statement
|
| Jun 28, 2012 at 1:03 | comment | added | Rik Smith-Unna | The purpose of peer review is not to detect fraud, so the peer review process did not fail 24 times for the same researcher. It's just that a researcher falsified his results. Unfortunately in science, as in all things, people can be deceiving. I don't think it's a reason to be any more skeptical about scientific papers than about anything else, and indeed scientific papers have other characteristics that make them, generally, the most reliable source of information we have. | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 20:58 | comment | added | bobthejoe | That last paragraph is completely unnecessary. Anyone who knows what is going on would know this. | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 9:32 | history | edited | Mad Scientist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2012 at 9:27 | history | answered | Gianpaolo R | CC BY-SA 3.0 |