Skip to main content
added ID
Source Link
Oreotrephes
  • 5.8k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 55

species ID

I feel reasonably confident this is a late-instar Acanthocephala declivis nymph (that is, almost-but-not-quite-adult).

Compare your pictures with those on bugguide of a similarly-aged individual, or the bugguide ID page. Also see the key here; which gives three characters for declivis

Humeral angles of pronotum broadly expanded, extending laterally well beyond maximum lateral abdominal margin. Distal dilation of hind tibia broad until apex, then curving in at right angles to tibial shaft. Anterior pronotal lobe with 2 small shining blunt tubercles along midline

If you look at your pictures, you'll see that you're three for three here: the broad 'shoulders' (pronotum), the right-angle in the leg flange (dilated tibia) just above the the 'ankle', and the two rounded bumps on the pronotum (visible in photos 1 and 3).

original answer / working towards the ID

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus (pdf on Leptoglossus in Georgia).

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus (pdf on Leptoglossus in Georgia).

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

species ID

I feel reasonably confident this is a late-instar Acanthocephala declivis nymph (that is, almost-but-not-quite-adult).

Compare your pictures with those on bugguide of a similarly-aged individual, or the bugguide ID page. Also see the key here; which gives three characters for declivis

Humeral angles of pronotum broadly expanded, extending laterally well beyond maximum lateral abdominal margin. Distal dilation of hind tibia broad until apex, then curving in at right angles to tibial shaft. Anterior pronotal lobe with 2 small shining blunt tubercles along midline

If you look at your pictures, you'll see that you're three for three here: the broad 'shoulders' (pronotum), the right-angle in the leg flange (dilated tibia) just above the the 'ankle', and the two rounded bumps on the pronotum (visible in photos 1 and 3).

original answer / working towards the ID

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus (pdf on Leptoglossus in Georgia).

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

added link
Source Link
Oreotrephes
  • 5.8k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 55

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus (pdf on Leptoglossus in Georgia).

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus.

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus (pdf on Leptoglossus in Georgia).

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

added 83 characters in body
Source Link
Oreotrephes
  • 5.8k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 55

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus.

You could try this key to floridaFlorida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs.

You could try this key to florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

You're right on track, it definitely looks like a true bug (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). Possibly immature if it looks wingless. Maybe some kind of Assassin Bug (Reduviidae)? They don't all have burly forelimbs. You might also want to consider Coreidae, for instance the genus Leptoglossus.

You could try this key to Florida bug families, it looks pretty user-friendly.

Source Link
Oreotrephes
  • 5.8k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 55
Loading