Skip to main content
edited title
Link
WYSIWYG
  • 35.6k
  • 9
  • 68
  • 157

Why is the resting potential of a neuron so close to the equilibrium potential of K+K⁺?

added 77 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
WYSIWYG
  • 35.6k
  • 9
  • 68
  • 157

I know this has something to do with the K+K+ leak channel. I just don't understand how.

I know that 3 Na+Na+ are pumped out for every 2 K+K+ pumped in. This makes the cell interior net negative.

I know that K+K+ is allowed to leak out slowly via K+K+ leak channels.

How does this place the resting potential of the cell so much closer to the equilibrium potential of K+K+ than Na+Na+?

I know this has something to do with the K+ leak channel. I just don't understand how.

I know that 3 Na+ are pumped out for every 2 K+ pumped in. This makes the cell interior net negative.

I know that K+ is allowed to leak out slowly via K+ leak channels.

How does this place the resting potential of the cell so much closer to the equilibrium potential of K+ than Na+?

I know this has something to do with the K+ leak channel. I just don't understand how.

I know that 3 Na+ are pumped out for every 2 K+ pumped in. This makes the cell interior net negative.

I know that K+ is allowed to leak out slowly via K+ leak channels.

How does this place the resting potential of the cell so much closer to the equilibrium potential of K+ than Na+?

Source Link
kevin
  • 21
  • 2

Why is the resting potential of a neuron so close to the equilibrium potential of K+?

I know this has something to do with the K+ leak channel. I just don't understand how.

I know that 3 Na+ are pumped out for every 2 K+ pumped in. This makes the cell interior net negative.

I know that K+ is allowed to leak out slowly via K+ leak channels.

How does this place the resting potential of the cell so much closer to the equilibrium potential of K+ than Na+?