Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackBiology/status/1275035850502483968
added 455 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
AP2261
  • 392
  • 2
  • 9

What I know about centre-surround type receptive fields is that depending on whether the region is on or off, the response to being stimulated is either excitatory or inhibitory respectively. So if a light shines on the centre of an on-centre/off-surround and off-centre/on-surround fields, spikes would be detected in the first case and not the second.

To my understanding, if both centre and surround areas are simultaneously stimulated, no spikes would be detected in either of the above given-given fields. However, that means that if I am staring at what is essentially a blank white wall, I shouldn't be able to see anything. But that is obviously not happening. What am I missing here?

Also, on a related note - do on-centre & surround or off-centre & surround fields exist? What function do they serve, if any? What are the other types of visual receptive fields in humans, or other animals? Is there a major difference in properties of visual fields across species?

Edit: While browsing a few resources on receptive fields, I found this very-helpful image here.

How visual fields help in edge-detection

This image perfectly illustrates my question: what happens to the grey areas in the right image? How are they processed by the retinal ganglion cells?

What I know about centre-surround type receptive fields is that depending on whether the region is on or off, the response to being stimulated is either excitatory or inhibitory respectively. So if a light shines on the centre of an on-centre/off-surround and off-centre/on-surround fields, spikes would be detected in the first case and not the second.

To my understanding, if both centre and surround areas are simultaneously stimulated, no spikes would be detected in either of the above given fields. However, that means that if I am staring at what is essentially a blank white wall, I shouldn't be able to see anything. But that is obviously not happening. What am I missing here?

Also, on a related note - do on-centre & surround or off-centre & surround fields exist? What function do they serve, if any? What are the other types of visual receptive fields in humans, or other animals? Is there a major difference in properties of visual fields across species?

What I know about centre-surround type receptive fields is that depending on whether the region is on or off, the response to being stimulated is either excitatory or inhibitory respectively. So if a light shines on the centre of an on-centre/off-surround and off-centre/on-surround fields, spikes would be detected in the first case and not the second.

To my understanding, if both centre and surround areas are simultaneously stimulated, no spikes would be detected in either of the above-given fields. However, that means that if I am staring at what is essentially a blank white wall, I shouldn't be able to see anything. But that is obviously not happening. What am I missing here?

Also, on a related note - do on-centre & surround or off-centre & surround fields exist? What function do they serve, if any? What are the other types of visual receptive fields in humans, or other animals? Is there a major difference in properties of visual fields across species?

Edit: While browsing a few resources on receptive fields, I found this very-helpful image here.

How visual fields help in edge-detection

This image perfectly illustrates my question: what happens to the grey areas in the right image? How are they processed by the retinal ganglion cells?

Source Link
AP2261
  • 392
  • 2
  • 9

Visual receptive fields

What I know about centre-surround type receptive fields is that depending on whether the region is on or off, the response to being stimulated is either excitatory or inhibitory respectively. So if a light shines on the centre of an on-centre/off-surround and off-centre/on-surround fields, spikes would be detected in the first case and not the second.

To my understanding, if both centre and surround areas are simultaneously stimulated, no spikes would be detected in either of the above given fields. However, that means that if I am staring at what is essentially a blank white wall, I shouldn't be able to see anything. But that is obviously not happening. What am I missing here?

Also, on a related note - do on-centre & surround or off-centre & surround fields exist? What function do they serve, if any? What are the other types of visual receptive fields in humans, or other animals? Is there a major difference in properties of visual fields across species?