One lab I was in was paranoid about keeping it in a foil-wrapped conical tube; my current lab leaves it out on the bench (and it works fine for staining gels). It's the same company/concentration in both cases, but this second lab uses it up much faster.
2 Answers
Good question.
I found this reference in "Molecular Biology: A Project Approach"
A phenomenon called photobleaching occurs when ethidium bromide (EtBr) -stained DNA is illuminated by ultraviolet light.... This decreased fluorescence is presumably due to the dissociation of ethidium bromide from the DNA.
Ethidium bromide fluoresces when it is in a hydrophobic environment, such as when its stuck between two base pair stacks in DNA- water quenches its fluorescence.
I also found this article citing the fact that sunlight can break down EtBr but only when a catalyst of iron and titanium dioxide is there to catalyze the reaction.
A lot of the original characterization of EtBr as a stain is very old, so I couldn't access it directly online... It looks like the compound itself is pretty stable, but UV can, somehow interact with it when its bound to DNA to bleach it out.
-
1$\begingroup$ Thanks. So on the bench in its bottle, ethidium bromide shouldn't be light-sensitive, unless there's iron and titanium dioxide contamination (or some hydrophobic substance)? (also, could you link to the article? I'm pretty sure I found it earlier but I can't find it anymore) $\endgroup$– blepCommented Jun 5, 2013 at 23:57
-
2$\begingroup$ I should think not. Eppendorf tubes are UV absorbant anyway. I added a link to the article - thought I had it there.. (UV reference: eppendorfna.com/int/…) $\endgroup$– shigetaCommented Jun 6, 2013 at 5:22
In my current lab we just leave the bottle out (but use it up pretty quickly as we have 20+ people). But we do buy 5 bottles at a time and leave them in the same spot as the bottle that is in use (inside a hood, with the light always turned on) and we've never had a problem with degradation/expiration