Revisions to HIV and open reading frames

added 5 characters in body

Source Link

edited Dec 8, 2015 at 20:51

12.9k
5
48
75

In Wilk et al. 2001 I saw that HIV has 3 open reading frames. In the Watts et al. 2009, I noticed they mentioned HIV has 9 open reading frames. I don't understand this very well.

e.g. #1: [ATG] GAT GTA AGT #2: A[TG G]AT GTA AGT #3: AT[G GA]T GTA AGT

[ATG] GAT GTA AGT

A[TG G]AT GTA AGT

AT[G GA]T GTA AGT

Could anyone explain this to me?

In Wilk et al. 2001 I saw that HIV has 3 open reading frames. In the Watts et al. 2009, I noticed they mentioned HIV has 9 open reading frames. I don't understand this very well.

e.g. #1: [ATG] GAT GTA AGT #2: A[TG G]AT GTA AGT #3: AT[G GA]T GTA AGT

Could anyone explain this to me?

In Wilk et al. 2001 I saw that HIV has 3 open reading frames. In the Watts et al. 2009, I noticed they mentioned HIV has 9 open reading frames. I don't understand this very well.

e.g.

[ATG] GAT GTA AGT

A[TG G]AT GTA AGT

AT[G GA]T GTA AGT

Could anyone explain this to me?

The question has nothing to do with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, as it asks nothing relevant about the disease that HIV generates, so the tag itself should not be used in this context.

Link

edited Dec 6, 2015 at 23:58

AMR

5.1k
1
21
38

added 136 characters in body

Source Link

edited Dec 6, 2015 at 18:57

Remi.b

68.3k
11
144
235

In the older literatureWilk et al. 2001 I saw that HIV has 3 open reading frames. In the newer paper, howeverWatts et al. 2009, I noticed itthey mentioned HIV has 9 open reading frames. I don't understand this very well.

e.g. #1: [ATG] GAT GTA AGT #2: A[TG G]AT GTA AGT #3: AT[G GA]T GTA AGT

Could anyone explain this to me?

Source Link

asked Dec 5, 2015 at 21:09

Kookaburra

71
6

Loading

Stack Exchange Network

Return to Question