NADH is used mainly in cellular respiration and the NAD+ to NADH ratio inside the cell is kept high, but NADPH is mainly used in photosynthesis and the NADPH to NADP+ ratio is kept low in animal cells.
Why is this?
NADH is used mainly in cellular respiration and the NAD+ to NADH ratio inside the cell is kept high, but NADPH is mainly used in photosynthesis and the NADPH to NADP+ ratio is kept low in animal cells.
Why is this?
NADPH is first generated in the light reactions of photosynthesis before it is used in the reductive synthesis of sugars. But this would seem irrelevant to mammalian systems. NADPH is used in mammalian cells for reductive synthetic reactions, e.g. fatty acid and steroid synthesis.
Although it is merely an opinion, it would seem to me advantageous to separate pools of reducing power for energy generation and synthesis so as to allow regulatory prioritization of the former over the latter. And, incidentally, the generation of NADPH in mammalian cells is independent of that of NADH, being primarily in the pentose phosphate shunt, a pathway found particularly in tissues like adipose tissue, mammary gland, liver and steroid-synthesizing tissues.
Although I now see that a similar question has been asked before the most voted answer repeats the somewhat unsatisfactory statement of the question (to be found in Albers et al.):
“The ratio of NAD+ to NADH inside the cell is high, while the ratio of NADP+ to NADPH is kept low.”
The reason I consider this unsatisfactory is, as just stated, some tissues are specialized for reductive synthesis of fatty acids and steroids, whereas others are not. Their need for NADPH will obviously differ, as will the redox ratio. Remarks about “the cell” are unfortunately typical of texts generalizing metabolism from bacteria.