4
$\begingroup$

Here is a question I am trying to find the answer to

Reptiles are a paraphyletic group because... ?

A) They include worm lizards, which have no limbs

B) The group doesn’t include birds

C) The group doesn’t include mammals

D) Not all of them have three- chambered hearts

I’m a bit confused about the reasoning. I know a paraphyletic group does not have all of its descendants so if birds were to be included it would become monophyletic. So is B the answer? Could anyone help explain it better?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I think the question's phrasing is a little wobbly, which make it a little hard to understand. But I think you understood what your teacher was expecting. I agree with you, answer is B. $\endgroup$ – Remi.b Jul 16 at 6:21
5
$\begingroup$

I think the question's phrasing is arguably a little wobbly, typically as to the nature of what someone would mean by the term "reptile". But I think you understood what your teacher was expecting. I agree with you, answer is B.

Reptilia is a clade (clade = monophyletic group) that encompasses all species that we traditionally classify as reptiles + all birds. Hence, our traditional definition of reptile makes up for a paraphyletic group as birds aren't included.

Related post: If dinosaurs could have feathers, would they still be reptiles?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To me it seems "Reptiles are a paraphyletic group because the group doesn’t include birds" is fine and not the least "wobbly", assuming Reptiles != Reptilia. $\endgroup$ – mgkrebbs Jul 16 at 17:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.