I'm having some trouble understanding some bits of a study, mostly about the Sleeping Beauty system and TARIS model, from this paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408613/

I understand the concept, but not how it works technically. Can anyone explain it for me?


1 Answer 1


I can't find a reference to a "TARIS model" in the paper you linked, but we can break down the molecular circuitry of this lineage tag tracking system step-by-step.

  1. The authors use a type of Tet expression system in order to tightly control the expression of a hyperactive Sleeping Beauty (HSB) transposase. In the absence of doxycycline, the reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator M2-rtTA does not bind the TetO operator. Jackson Labs has a very good summary of Tet-On (and Tet-Off) systems:

... rtTA is a fusion protein comprised of the TetR repressor and the VP16 transactivation domain; however, a four amino acid change in the tetR DNA binding moiety alters rtTA's binding characteristics such that it can only recognize the tetO sequences in the [tetracycline-responsive promoter element (TRE)] of the target transgene in the presence of the Dox effector. Thus, in the Tet-On system, transcription of the TRE-regulated target gene is stimulated by rtTA only in the presence of Dox.

  1. In the presence of doxycycline, the transactivator drives expression of HSB from the constituent promoters of the TetO operator. HSB contains DNA binding motifs that specifically recognize the direct repeats (white triangles) and a catalytic domain that excises the direct repeats and the DNA they flank, which contains a transcription stop signal (Tn-STOP).
  2. Excision of the Tn-STOP signal allows for expression of DsRed driven by a strong synthetic promoter (CAGGS, first described here). The excised sequence is then inserted somewhere else in the genome.
  3. Because successful Tn-STOP excision is concurrent with transcription of DsRed, red fluorescing cells can be selected and prepared for NGS. HSB transposition is "random", so two different transposition events are unlikely to target the same insertion locus. The specific insertion site can then be used as a molecular fingerprint to identify the progenitor stem cell after replication and differentiation.

excerpt from Figure 1 of Sun et al. 2015


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .