Thiol-Based Reducing Agents
The instability of thiol-based reducing agents in solution is due to their propensity to form disulfide bonds by the following half reaction:
$$\ce{2RSH -> RSSR + 2H+ + 2e-}$$
It is clear that disulfide formation requires:
- Deprotonation of the thiols to form thiolates (RS-).
- An electron acceptor.
Therefore, solutions of thiol-based reducing agents would be most stable when:
- The pH is buffered to where the thiol form predominates. The pKa of the thiol in β-mercaptoethanol is 9.5 and in dithiothreitol are 9.2 and 10.1 (Whitesides et al., 1977). Buffering the pH lower than this should increase stability.
- Electron acceptors are removed. In aqueous solution, the electron acceptor is molecular oxygen. Degassing the buffer and storing the solutions under an inert gas such as argon should increase stability.
- Reaction catalysts are removed. Divalent metal cations, especially copper (II) (Cu2+), catalyze oxygen dependent disulfide formation, even in trace amounts (Smith et al., 1994). Therefore a chelator such as EDTA should increase stability.
- Temperature is low. As with most chemical reactions, rate increases with temperature.
The stabilities of the thiol-based reducing agents β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), dithiothreitol (DTT) and glutathione (GSH) have been determined in solution as a function of pH at 20°C (Stevens et al., 1983):
...and temperature at pH 8.5:
...as well as in the presence of copper (II) and EDTA at pH 8.5 and 20°C:
Below is the tabulated raw data (this is the actual data from the paper which I used to create the above graphs, but take note that I found it difficult to plot “>100”):
Half-life (h)
pH Temp (°C) Additive β-ME DTT GSH
6.5 20 - >100 40 16
7.5 20 - 10 10 9
8.5 20 - 4.0 1.4 1.3
8.5 0 - 21 11 8
8.5 40 - 1.0 0.2 0.2
8.5 20 Cu(II) 0.6 0.6 1.2
8.5 20 EDTA >100 4 70
As expected, stability decreased with increasing pH and temperature, and also with the addition of copper. Stability increased with the addition of EDTA.
Non-Thiol-Based Reducing Agents
Han and Han (1994) studied the effect of pH and buffer composition on the solution stability of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). Though this is not a thiol-based reducing agent, it is still subject to oxidation. However, it is quite stable in solution:
pH Solute/Buffer % TCEP Oxidized After 3 Weeks
7.5 Tris-HCl 18.7 ± 0.6
8.5 Tris-HCl 16.8 ± 0.5
9.5 Tris-HCl 14.5 ± 0.5
8.2 borate 6.6 ± 0.2
10.2 borate 5.3 ± 0.1
6.8 HEPES 14.8 ± 0.4
8.2 HEPES 13.6 ± 0.3
9.7 CAPS 9.8 ± 0.3
11.1 CAPS 4.3 ± 0.1
Stability increased with increasing pH, though the effect was not large. Interestingly, the buffer composition had a larger effect on stability which was especially pronounced with phosphate:
% TCEP Oxidized After 72 Hours
pH 0.15 M phosphate 0.35 M phosphate
6.0 not determined 11.2 ± 0.3
6.8 8.1 ± 0.4 56.8 ± 2.3
7.0 23.5 ± 0.9 100
7.2 33.4 ± 1.0 100
7.4 56.5 ± 1.4 100
7.6 56.8 ± 2.1 100
7.8 48.9 ± 2.5 100
8.0 36.6 ± 1.7 100
10.6 not determined 11.7 ± 0.5
11.6 not determined 9.1 ± 0.4
References
Han JC, Han GY. 1994. A Procedure for Quantitative Determination of Tris(2-Carboxyethyl)phosphine, an Odorless Reducing Agent More Stable and Effective Than Dithiothreitol. Anal Biochem 220(1):5-10.
Smith RC, Reed VD, Hill WE. 1994. Oxidation Of Thiols By Copper(II). Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 90(1-4):147-154.
Stevens R, Stevens L, Price NC. 1983. The stabilities of various thiol compounds used in protein purifications. Biochemical Education 11(2):70.
Whitesides GM, Lilburn JE, Szajewski RP. 1977. Rates of thiol-disulfide interchange reactions between mono- and dithiols and Ellman's reagent. J Org Chem 42(2):332-338.